call letters, numbers and stuff
This is interesting. No one has done anything about this yet, and now the bean counters have figured out they can't bil anyone correctly. So, the ball is rolling. Promo people need to get involved. Ask your GM if your station is aware of what the NAB is doing about this.
As broadcast television stations start to convert their analog signals to digital, which will provide for a potential increase in the number of “channels” that will be available to viewers and advertisers, the issue of establishing a standard method for the industry to use to identify these “channels” has become very important.
In doing business for over 50 years advertisers and their agencies have used “call letters” to identify the station. Now, with the option of multiple “channels” each of these offerings will need to have a unique “call letter” in order to facilitate the ordering and invoicing process.
TVB has spoken with the FCC, the NAB and various other organizations and found that in the legislation mandating the changes to digital only the technical issues were addressed, not the business issues. In addition, with the tremendous advances in technology, multiple platforms for the distribution of content by local TV stations that may contain advertising messages have emerged, such as Web Sites, VOD, and mobile devices like cell phones and PDAs. Each medium needs to have some sort of unique identification.
On December 13, 2005 TVB convened a meeting of the AAAA/TVB Joint Task Force on E-Business Process to discuss these issues. Representatives from agencies and broadcasters, and their respective system vendors, as well as interested parties from the measurement and tracking companies, the NAB and the ATSC (the organization that established the digital standards) were present. Among the items discussed were the needs for various levels of identification, system capabilities and suggested formats.
The next step was to form a small sub-committee of TVB members to isolate the various needs and options and to report back to the full Task Force. That sub-committee met on January 11, 2006 and has come up with a recommendation that will be presented to the rest of the Task Force and the vendor community. In the meantime, the system vendors are investigating the fields that are currently in their respective systems, and their capabilities, and are to report back to the Task Force.
As advances are made in this area, we will post that information as a continuation of this report.
